Best Movies of the 2010s

Much of my interest and enthusiasm for movies has waned significantly (and I never thought I’d get to this point). But I am interested in seeing some of the best movies of the decade, especially those that compare favorably to all-time great movies prior to the decade. I’m going to use Film Comment’s top 50 as a guide. If you guys know of any other good lists, or have any strong, personal recommendations, let me know.

12 thoughts on “Best Movies of the 2010s

  1. From that list, I’ve seen Moonlight, Carol, Boyhood, Inside Llewyn Davis, Certified Copy, First Reformed, and The Social Network. I have The Phantom Thread on my computer but haven’t watched it yet.

      1. It was interesting but I didn’t care for the last part for some reason. Thought-provoking for sure. You might like it. I think you might especially like the part where I thought it jumped the rails.

        Which have you seen?

    1. OK, thanks for the feedback.

      I’ve seen Boyhood, Inside Llewyn Davis, Certified Copy, The Social Network, Uncle Boonmee…, Holy Motors, The Tree of Life, Under the Skin (Didn’t we see that together?), The Turin Horse, The Act of Killing, The Assassin, Mad Max: Fury Road, Faces Places, A Separation, This is Not a Film, Poetry.

      Writing out this list gives me some confidence about Film Comment’s judgment. These seem like worthy choices–although I didn’t love Llewlyn or Mad Max as much as other critics.

      1. …or Boyhood or the Social Network.

        Yeah I did see Under the Skin with you. Missed that—maybe I should look at the list again.

        Two omissions I notice right off are Inside Out and Up.

    2. Yeah, I don’t think I cared for The Social Network. I think thought a little more highly of Boyhood. (Man, I don’t have a clear memory of my feelings about those films.)

  2. I just watched Godard’s Goodbye to Language. I’m not comfortable judging the film, as I’m miles away from having a decent understanding of it. A part of me feels like the film is a conscious a self-conscious assault not only on narratives, but logic itself, particularly the linear aspect of this. I believe Breathless was known for it’s abrupt editing, I have seen any of Godard’s 70’s films, so I don’t know where he took that approach, but in this film, he seems to have taken it to an extreme–music, phrases, ideas, sounds–in addition to visual images seem randomly cut. Fragmenting, fragmenting, fragmenting–denying the viewer any completion of any idea or even a meaningful sequence, and he does this by stultifying any logical development.

    I should not that this approach feels very different from other non-narrative films. These type of films can deny narrative, but they don’t actively and conspicuously deny or prevent some for of meaningful sequence or development. A filmmaker can organize and develop images, sounds, words, and music in a non-narrative and even confusing way, in a conventional sense. But such films can convey meaning, emotion and an aesthetic experience that is non-rational. Godard seems to be denying this.

    Right now, I don’t even know what aspects of the film have meaning. For example, the movie references books, films, and utilizes fragments of familiar music. Generally, I would assume that Godard had a reason for choosing these things and that they have a meaning. But I’m not sure. I’m also not sure if and wheh he’s using certain images in a symbolic way. If every decision he made has some purpose, deciphering this film is going to take a really long time.

    I will say that the film interested me enough to watch it a second time. And I may even re-watch it. (It’s only 70 minutes so that has something to do with it.)

  3. Zama (2018)
    Dir. Lucretia Martel
    59/100

    I don’t have a good grasp of this film, and I haven’t really analyzed it deeply, and I’m not sure I will. The film takes place in the 18th century involves a Spanish magistrate in South America waiting to be transferred. He is an average man, which is to say a man characterized by weakness, failure, and a lack of ability, much more than the opposite. The whole film seems to be about the futility of such a person’s life. I have a feeling the movie is more than that, but that’s my initial impression.

    The one thing that stands out about the film to me is the visuals. This is a period film, and the cinematography, costumes, set designs, and even casting of both professional actors and extras are all very good. In this way, the film reminds me of Barry Lyndon (although not as gorgeous), and The Leopard.

  4. The Master (2012)
    Dir. Paul Thomas Anderson
    Starring: Joaquin Phoenix, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, etc.
    75/100
    (rating could get higher)

    I’m not a big fan of P.T. Anderson, at least not his more recent work, although I suspect I say this because the later films (e.g., Punch Drunk Love, There Will Be Blood) didn’t match the hype. (I didn’t really care for Inherent Vice as well.)

    This film feels like the most interesting and original, at least in terms of the story and themes. Freddie Quell (Phoenix) is an outsider whose oddness and personal problems will almost always keep him on the outside, reminiscent of Travis Bickle, perhaps. Quell, by chance, happens to meet Lancaster Dodd (Hoffman), a leader of a quasi-religious group. Quell is drawn into this group.

    Before I write about my reaction, a quick word on whether I think it’s a worthy candidate for one of the best films of the 2010. I haven’t fully analyzed the film, so I can’t speak confidently, but I think it has potential to be a solid pick. Take that for what you will.

    **
    My impression of the film was that it would be a fairly typical, unoriginal story about a cult-like leader–similar to the way I felt TWBB was a rather unoriginal story about a business mogul who yearned for an intimate loving relationship (similar to Charles Foster Kane). But this film surprised me.

    I don’t have a great grasp on the film yet–specifically, a great grasp on the two main characters or the dynamics and nature of their relationship. Right now, I think that’s where the essence of the film lies.

    ***
    Here are some thoughts off the top of my head:

    Typically Hollywood movies portray the Lancaster Dodd character as frauds, con-men, hypocrites, and/or outright kooks. This film doesn’t really do that–or at least the character is much more complex. Dodd may be kooky, but a part of me feels like he is genuinely searching for some deeper meaning.

    Really, both Quell and Dodd are what some Christians call, “seekers”–namely, non-believers who are genuinely open and seeking answers about God and spiritual matters. Dodd has started the project, and when he meets Quell, Quell becomes someone that Dodd believes he can help, or at least that is a genuine part of his motivation, which may involve other things. Because of this, I believe Quell is drawn to Dodd, even though, deep down, he is doesn’t really buy the spiritual message. Indeed, Quell isn’t so much a seeker as much as an outsider who is search of acceptance and even love. That Dodd seems to provide this, on some genuine level, is a powerful draw, earning a kind of interesting devotion and loyalty–interesting because Quell seems cognizant, at times, that much of Dodd’s ideas are bunk, but he seems loyal as any true believer (in a cult).

    I’m not sure a lot of American movies have really captured this dynamic. On some level, the film makes me think of Robert Duvall’s The Apostle–because the main character is a complex mix of genuine religiosity and a more savage and carnal side that seems incompatible with the former. Quell and Dodd are like that (especially Quell), but The Apostle doesn’t have this father-son dynamic. Both films are wholly American, though.

    More later.

  5. Burning (2018)
    Dir. Lee Chang-dong
    79/100

    A good candidate for the best films of the 2010s. I regret not watching this without any breaks or interruptions. I thought Poetry and Oasis, two other films by Lee, were interesting. I’m at the point where I’ll see a film if he’s directing it. (I need to watch Secret Sunshine, a film I think Don recommended.)

    **
    The Netflix description I read didn’t really spoil the movie, but I would recommend avoiding that and going in blind. But if you need more information, here’s a brief description. Lee Jong-soo (a guy) runs into a childhood neighbor, Shin Hae-mi. There relationship begins to develop, but Shin leaves for a planned trip to Kenya. There she meets another Korean guy, Ben. When they get back, the three begin to hang out.

    At this point, a reader might think the film could be a rom-com or just a romantic love-triangle. It could be just a drama about friendship, or a thriller or action film. For people who want to know, I will rule say that it’s not a rom-com.

    ***
    I saw this film last weekend, and I regret not writing sooner. But here are some quick thoughts:

    The film seems to be about two things–one of which is a rather well-worn subject and the other, not so much. The former involves the state of slackerhood and malaise of twenty-somethings–specifically involving the lack of meaning. The latter involves a sense of uncertainty about what to believe is true–something that seems like a big part of the current zeitgeist. I like the way the film deals with this by using a mystery, love-triangle, while also creating a sense of mystery with all three characters.

    The crepuscular dance sequence (as well as as one or two scenes that precede it) was really terrific and beautiful. It’s the type of moment that could become iconic. (It’s example of a better use of film score from the original.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *